Published on

Crafting an Effective AI Governance Policy

Authors

As generative AI becomes an integral part of organizational strategies, in-house legal teams are at the forefront of navigating the complex interplay between innovation and compliance. While the potential for AI to transform operational efficiency and product development is undeniable, the risks—from data privacy concerns to intellectual property challenges—demand a thoughtful, proactive approach. Here, we explore how in-house counsel can craft effective governance policies to address these evolving challenges.

Three Critical AI Use Cases

Before crafting AI governance policies, legal teams must understand the primary contexts in which AI tools are used:

  1. Internal Operations: AI tools enhancing workflows, such as document drafting, meeting transcription, or data analytics, where company data is the primary input.

  2. Client Service Support: Instances where client data is processed through AI tools, raising heightened concerns around confidentiality, data protection, and contractual obligations.

  3. Product Integration: Embedding AI features into customer-facing products or services, often triggering complex questions around data ownership, liability, and compliance.

Each use case presents unique risks, requiring tailored governance measures that address both internal processes and external obligations.

Building the Foundations of AI Governance

1. Robust Privacy Frameworks

Develop clear guidelines for data collection, processing, and storage that align with laws like GDPR, CCPA, and relevant sector-specific regulations. Map data flows to identify sensitive data, cross-border transfers, and subprocessor relationships. For example, when integrating U.S.-based AI models with European data, ensure compliance with EU laws and mechanisms such as Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs).

2. Tailored Vendor Vetting Processes

Expand vendor due diligence to account for AI-specific risks. Contracts should address data usage and retention policies, anonymization and aggregation protocols, and ownership rights for input and output data. Include robust warranties and indemnities to protect against IP infringement and misuse of proprietary information.

3. Practical Employee Training

Provide role-specific training to ensure employees understand AI’s capabilities and risks. Product teams should focus on safe development practices, sales teams on ethical client interactions, and marketing teams on generating accurate and unbiased content. Highlight the risks of AI, including inaccurate outputs or biases that could damage the organization’s reputation.

Data Ownership and IP Challenges

Ownership of AI-generated outputs presents one of the thorniest legal questions. Unlike traditional software tools, many generative AI platforms include terms that claim ownership over both inputs and outputs. Legal teams must:

  • Distinguish Between Free and Enterprise Tools: Consumer-facing tools often use inputs and outputs for training, while enterprise-grade agreements may limit data use to service provision. For example, OpenAI’s enterprise terms prohibit training on customer data, offering greater protections.

  • Address Copyright Gaps: AI-generated content may lack explicit copyright protection, leaving organizations vulnerable. This is particularly critical for code generation tools used in product development. To mitigate risks, implement “human-in-the-loop” practices to ensure significant human contributions that establish copyrightability.

Managing Data Inputs and Outputs

Effective AI governance requires clear protocols for managing data inputs and reviewing outputs to minimize risks and maintain compliance.

1. Prohibiting Sensitive Data Inputs

Establish policies that restrict employees from inputting personal, confidential, or commercially sensitive data into AI systems without prior approval. This reduces the risk of exposing trade secrets, client data, or other sensitive information to unauthorized access or misuse.

2. Reviewing Outputs for Accuracy and Bias

AI-generated outputs may include inaccuracies, biases, or infringing content. To address this, implement processes for regular audits of AI outputs and require mandatory reviews by subject matter experts before releasing any customer-facing content. These measures help ensure outputs are accurate, compliant, and aligned with organizational standards.

Ensuring Compliance with Emerging Regulations

The regulatory landscape for AI is evolving rapidly, with new laws and guidelines emerging worldwide. Key areas of focus include:

  • Transparency Requirements: Regulations like the EU’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act emphasize the need for clear disclosures about AI usage. Organizations should consider implementing disclaimers, watermarks, and detailed documentation of AI processes.

  • Automated Decision-Making Restrictions: Under GDPR, individuals have the right not to be subjected to solely automated decisions that significantly affect them. This may require organizations to provide opt-outs or offer manual review options for affected individuals.

  • Sector-Specific Compliance: Industries such as healthcare and finance face additional scrutiny. AI systems used in these contexts must meet stringent accuracy, accountability, and fairness standards.

Creating a Culture of Responsible AI Use

Ensuring compliance and ethical AI use goes beyond policies and contracts. Building a culture of responsibility involves:

1. Open Feedback Channels

Create an environment where employees feel comfortable raising concerns or suggesting improvements related to AI tools and policies. This encourages proactive identification and resolution of potential issues.

2. Regular Updates and Communication

Keep employees informed about regulatory changes, emerging risks, and best practices. Frequent communication helps teams stay aligned with the latest developments in AI governance.

3. Collaboration Across Teams

Foster collaboration between product, engineering, and compliance teams to ensure AI use aligns with organizational objectives and legal requirements. Cross-functional efforts promote consistency and accountability across the organization.

Conclusion

For in-house legal teams, crafting effective AI governance policies is both a challenge and an opportunity. By proactively addressing privacy, data security, intellectual property, and compliance concerns, legal counsel can empower their organizations to harness the transformative power of AI responsibly. While the landscape may be complex, a thoughtful, collaborative approach ensures that innovation and compliance go hand in hand.